SentinelOne is working on something right now in the Ranger space that is going to allow us to remotely load endpoints that need the SentinelOne protection through the Ranger portion of the application.
It allows the end-user to almost seamlessly get SentinelOne loaded and operational without impacting their business, which is incredibly helpful. The improvement in the exclusions library has been phenomenal to help us get the new systems on the air with the new software. But, the detection of it attacking from a lateral basis has been improved immensely over the last three years. When an unprotected agent penetrates the firewall and attacks a network, that unprotected asset has no protection on it so that the hacker can do whatever they want from that box with no impedance. The improvements to the SentinelOne agent have enhanced its ability to catch everything and anything that comes in, including the detection of lateral movement attacks, which are the worst-case scenario. They listen to the analysts and managers that are using their product and they innovate constantly. The SentinelOne team is open to suggestions. When I learn about somebody who has been hacked and wants to have protection against problems such as ransomware occurring, this is the one solution that I recommend. I have been a proponent of SentinelOne for many years. SentinelOne started detecting things left and right that were completely unable to be seen prior.
It was eye-opening when we started deploying this at clients, locations where we felt we had very good peace of mind in terms of what was happening. Regular antivirus, rather than an EDR-type platform, gives people a false sense of security because there are a lot of processes running in the background that the typical antivirus solution is not equipped to catch. The biggest thing I've learned from using SentinelOne is that there are a lot more attacks out there than a typical antivirus will display. Since we've implemented this, we haven't had to do that in an environment where we had experienced having to do so previously. It's really hard to quantify the savings, but if a client were to get ransomware, it could involve weeks of several team members working around the clock to get them back up and running. It is one of the top things that we've implemented and it has saved us countless hours. My advice would be to implement SentinelOne immediately. It is a very good solution, but you have to compare it to understand it better. So, solutions like Microsoft Defender are not an option because they're cloud-based, whereas SentinelOne is an option in those environments. If you're in the financial world, a lot of the production networks are not connected to the internet. So, you need to consider how you're going to consume it if you have a disconnected network. The same is true for Cisco AMP and other solutions that are deployed on-prem. So, if you're deploying on-prem, you get the core features of SentinelOne, but you don't get all of the bells and whistles that you get from the cloud environment. What you don't get with the on-prem is all the AI. One of my customers is in the military defense area, and they have no connection to the internet. My advice would be to use the cloud, but it is a consideration of whether your endpoints can connect to the cloud or not. You have a choice between an on-premise console and the cloud. Using query searches, you can find what happened very easily. Anything done on a server, on a client, with a network connection, login, logout, changes in directories, et cetera, is recorded. SentinelOne provides an amazing amount of visibility over clients and servers.
#Sentinelone antivirus install#
They will not need to install two applications, one antivirus, and one EDR, on their clients' computers only one agent can do anything. If they replace their solutions with SentinelOne, they will have two features: EPP, endpoint protection from antiviruses, and EDR, endpoint protection and response features. These platforms provide only an antivirus solution, however. My advice for other companies that do not use SentinelOne is this: that everyone, every company, likely has its own antivirus solution, whether it's McAfee, Symantec, Kaspersky, and so on. Most people prefer to use cloud deployment in the way we do. The product has two deployment options, cloud deployment, and on-prem deployment. It's the agent that we install on servers and clients, it has versions we are using the latest version of agents. SentinelOne is a centralized platform that is hosted in the cloud.
0 kommentar(er)
